CSDN-Adobe Flex/AIR 专区 CSDN-Adobe Flex / AIR Zone
06月1st, 2008 — Dreamer 06月1 st, 2008 - DreamerCSDN 开通了一个Adobe Flex / AIR专区： http://flex.csdn.net/ ，板块很齐全。 CSDN launched a Adobe Flex / AIR zones: http://flex.csdn.net/, very full plate. 虽然我很久没去过CSDN了，不过为Adobe Flex/AIR开专区的国内网站好像不多，还是推荐一下。 Although I did not have been to CSDN a long time, but for Adobe Flex / AIR open area of domestic websites like small, or to recommend. 里面的不少文章CSDN都只是列了一个题目，点击之后就会跳转到原文了，这就是web 2.0？ The CSDN inside many articles are just out of a topic, click the following will Jump to the original, this is the web 2.0? 所谓用户创造内容？ The so-called user created content » 哈哈 . He
BTW，专区左边有一个相关链接，我看到其中有个叫做“闪无忧”的站点，最近看blog流量来源的时候也经常发现这个站点，我就想说一句：麻烦您转载我文章的时候能不能挂个链接到我blog原文的超链接？ BTW, there is a related area links the left, I saw them do with attitude "flash times," the site, look at the recent blog traffic sources are often found at this site, I want to say one sentence: I trouble you reprint of the article Can be linked to a link to the original text of my blog links » ？ » 我为了提醒那些“复制粘贴”或者“直接抓取”一族，已经在每篇日志都加上了转载说明了，您那么大一个用来赚钱的站点就不能好好看看？ To remind me of those "copy and paste" or "direct crawl" owners, in each log with a reprint of the note, you used to make money so much a site can not be good to see » 别跟我讲什么自由主义什么开放分享，建议这个站点向AnyFlex好好学习一下！ What other Genwo Jiang open to share what liberalism, recommended this site to AnyFlex to study well! 当然，您不理我我也没办法，另外特别感谢您没有除去原文中的一些链接 。 Of course, you ignore me I can not, and especially grateful you do not get rid of some of the original link.
本文链接: http://www.zhuoqun.net/html/y2008/1055.html 转载请注明出处，谢谢。 This link: http://www.zhuoqun.net/html/y2008/1055.html reprint please reference, thank you.
TrackBack引用地址： http://www.zhuoqun.net/html/y2008/1055.html/trackback TrackBack used Address: http://www.zhuoqun.net/html/y2008/1055.html/trackback
你好，我是闪无忧站长，很高兴看到这个帖子指出了我们的不足，以后我们会尊重你的意见。 Hello, I am a flash chief worry, I am very pleased to see this message that our inadequate, since we will respect your views. 同时我们也对贵博主的一些想法不敢苟同，你要求给你加文章连接我想应该是给你带去流量吧，你自己已经说了，“最近看blog流量来源的时候也经常发现这个站点”，在我这里说一句，你blog的慢慢起步也是有我们网站功劳的。 At the same time we have for your main Bo do not agree with some of the ideas, you want to increase your article I would like to be connected to the traffic you bring it, you own has been said, "look at the recent blog traffic sources are often found when this Site, "I say here, you slowly start the blog is also a credit of our site. 话又反说过来，如果我们网站不给你加注来源和连接，你会不会知道我们网站转载你的文章了呢，你在这里会不会单独把我们拿出来批评呢，依次类推，可能很多的网站转载你了你的文章，但没有加注你的连接和出处，没给你带来访问，但他们恰恰并没有受到批评。 It also said that anti-from, if we add the site does not give you the source and connection, would you know that our site you reprint the article is, here you will not be alone in our show to criticize it, followed by analogy, may Many of the sites you reprint your article, but did not add to your connection and the source, did not give you the visit, but they just do not be criticized.
另外说一点，我也是flasher，我们网站光服务器费用就超过了那点广告钱，而且我们陪上了不少时间和精力，但我们只是爱好这个东西，既然做了就不会放弃。 Another said that, I also flasher, our site-server than the cost of advertising money that point, and we take on a lot of time and effort, but we just love this thing, since done will not give up. 当然也希望它会越来越好。 Of course, hope that it will get better and better. 你说我们“用来赚钱的站点”，恐怕有偏颇之嫌另外我们也从来没跟贵博主接触过，所以谈不上“跟你讲什么自由主义什么开放分享”，不要让人家误解我们。 You say we are "to the site to make money," I am afraid that the suspected biased addition, we also have never Bo with your main contacts, so out of the question "What Genni Jiang open to share what liberalism," Do not let other people misunderstood us .
再次谢谢博主给我们的建议，我的QQ：2444021，邮件:bluewind2008@gmail.com博主有需要我们改进的地方，可以直接联系我 Thank you again to our main Bo proposed, my QQ: 2444021, e-mail: bluewind2008@gmail.com Bo in need of our main areas of improvement. I can directly link
首先，我Blog的起步和发展除了我自己，不靠任何人的功劳。 First of all, I Blog in addition to the starting and development of my own and not depend on any person's credit. 而且以后它的没落和死亡也肯定都是我自己搞的。 And after its decline and death are certainly engaged in my own.
另外，我看到你们的站点连CSDN都重视了才点个名的，在网上转载别人文章或者说直接抓取而不加链接的多了去了，我也生不起那个气。 In addition, I see your site even before CSDN all attach importance to the name of a point, others in the online reprint articles or crawl without a direct link to the more, I also can not afford that Health and gas. 一般的资源站点我也知道，会在标题下面加上一个所谓的来源：“来自XXX的blog”，不带超链接，基本上读者根本就不会注意到，而且原作者也没法说什么：人家确实已经注明出处了啊…………对不起，这种做法我没法表示理解。 General resource site I also know that in heading a so-called source added: "XXX from the blog", without hyperlinks, basically readers simply do not note that the original author but also can not say anything: people Indeed have a reference ah………… I am sorry, this practice that I can not understand. 我就是那么小心眼。 I was then Xiaoxin Yan. 如果你觉得我不可理喻的话，那就请以后不要从我这里转文章了。 If you think I Bukeliyu so, it will not please me from here to the article. 谢谢。谢谢.
那个“自由主义开放分享”的话不是针对你们，你误会了，我针对的是一些强盗逻辑的读者而已。 The "open sharing of liberalism," then not directed against you, you misunderstood, I am against is some gangster logic of readers only.